Why IA is already our guide

I read this morning a question about AI: What status should we give to AI?

I don't know if it is a softned question. Those who use AI already know they can measure how those processes teach us about reality, solutions, right questions. One question may be asked: "Which AI should we use as councelor?"

The question was developed in asking wether AI would remain a benefit of big companies that have the impact (data population) that allow big data. Of course the public will access to benefits of AI. But the question is rather: What AI? What will be it's bias of goals?

True AI is like the wind that blows. It has no idea about right or wrong, good or bad. But such a free state of mind would not be accepted by the public. But our people of power do accept it, and already observe their data with this truthfull approach. But no truth can safely be widely published.

If we want to set our own goals for our own education, we might need to learn to turn ourselves to some specific AI that will not have necessarily a large impact. Because impact means bias. This is the reason why I decided to learn big data. Because I want an access to reality, not to a softned version of reality.

Once such an AI exists for us we will be wise to choose it as a guide, as science can describe physical reality, this AI will be able to spot out our dots of incoherence. For now the bias of education is chosen by great companies which interface manipulative algorithms in order to gain such or such attitude. But once each of us takes full responsibility over our wish for truth and evolution, we will develop or find the true teacher AI, the one that can bring us further on the path of earth evolution.